|Year : 2017 | Volume
| Issue : 6 | Page : 500-509
Biological evaluation, docking and molecular dynamic simulation of some novel diaryl urea derivatives bearing quinoxalindione moiety
Sedighe Sadeghian-Rizi1, Ghadamali Ali Khodarahmi1, Amirhossein Sakhteman2, Ali Jahanian-Najafabadi3, Mahboubeh Rostami1, Mahmoud Mirzaei4, Farshid Hassanzadeh1
1 Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Isfahan Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, I.R. Iran
2 Department of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, I.R. Iran
3 Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, and Isfahan Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, I.R. Iran
4 Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Isfahan Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences; Bioinformatics Research Center, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, I.R. Iran
|Date of Web Publication||3-Nov-2017|
Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Isfahan Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
In this study a series of diarylurea derivatives containing quinoxalindione group were biologically evaluated for their cytotoxic activities using MTT assay against MCF-7 and HepG2 cell lines. Antibacterial activities of these compounds were also evaluated by Microplate Alamar Blue Assay (MABA) against three Gram-negative (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Salmonella typhi), three Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis and Listeria monocitogenes) and one yeast-like fungus (Candida albicans) strain. Furthermore, molecular docking was carried out to study the binding pattern of the compounds to the active site of B-RAF kinase (PDB code: 1UWH). Molecular dynamics simulation was performed on the best ligand (16e) to investigate the ligand binding dynamics in the physiological environment. Cytotoxic evaluation revealed the most prominent cytotoxicity for 6 compounds with IC50 values of 10-18 μM against two mentioned cell lines. None of the synthesized compounds showed significant antimicrobial activity. The obtained results of the molecular docking study showed that all compounds fitted in the binding site of enzyme with binding energy range of -11.22 to -12.69 kcal/mol vs sorafenib binding energy -11.74 kcal/mol as the lead compound. Molecular dynamic simulation indicated that the binding of ligand (16e) was stable in the active site of B-RAF during the simulation.
Keywords: Diaryl urea; Quinoxalindione; Docking; Cytotoxic; Molecular dynamic simulation; Sorafenib
|How to cite this article:|
Sadeghian-Rizi S, Khodarahmi GA, Sakhteman A, Jahanian-Najafabadi A, Rostami M, Mirzaei M, Hassanzadeh F. Biological evaluation, docking and molecular dynamic simulation of some novel diaryl urea derivatives bearing quinoxalindione moiety. Res Pharma Sci 2017;12:500-9
|How to cite this URL:|
Sadeghian-Rizi S, Khodarahmi GA, Sakhteman A, Jahanian-Najafabadi A, Rostami M, Mirzaei M, Hassanzadeh F. Biological evaluation, docking and molecular dynamic simulation of some novel diaryl urea derivatives bearing quinoxalindione moiety. Res Pharma Sci [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 Jul 12];12:500-9. Available from: http://www.rpsjournal.net/text.asp?2017/12/6/500/217430
| Introduction|| |
Cancer is a major worldwide health problem and based on World Health Organization (WHO) report by 2030 more than 13 million cancer deaths will be expected ,. Chemotherapy is one of the most frequently used treatment for cancers but adverse side effects and resistance to the current chemotherapeutic agents are the major reasons for the failure in cancer chemotherapy . Thus, development of more efficient and less toxic anticancer agents remains an important issue in drug design . Diaryl urea derivatives have broad spectrum of biological effects and pharmaceutical functions. Several diaryl urea derivatives such as sorafenib, regorafenib, linifanib and tivozanib have been so far synthesized and evaluated as the kinase inhibitors [Figure 1]. Sorafenib (BAY-43-9006), is the first orally bioavailable multiple kinase inhibitor approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicinal Agency (EMEA) for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. It inhibits the kinase activity of both C-RAF and B-RAF (wild type and V600E mutant) with IC50 values of 6.22 and 38 nM, respectively.
In addition, this molecule shows significant activity against several receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) involved in tumor cell proliferation and tumor angiogenesis including vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 and 3 (VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3) and platelet-derived growth factor receptors (PDGFR-β) ,,.
Introduction of a fluorine atom in the central phenyl ring of sorafenib led to the synthesize of regorafenib (BAY-73-4506), that has been approved by FDA for the treatment of colorectal cancer and gastrointestinal stromal tumor and inhibits C-RAF, V600E B-RAF and B-RAF with IC50 values of 2.5, 19 and 28 nM, respectively ,. Tivozanib (AV-951) hydrochloride is a potent and selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of all three vascular endothelial growth factor receptors. It has been evaluated in several clinical trials including a phase II and phase III studies, demonstrating safety and efficacy for patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma ,.
Linifanib (ABT-869) is a potent inhibitor of all VEGF and PDGF receptor tyrosine kinases that shows significant clinical activity as the monotherapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and inhibits kinase insert domain receptor (KDR) with an IC50 of 28 nM ,.
In this work, based on previous structure activity relationships (SARs) of sorafenib and its analogs we retained the diarylurea functionality as the key pharmacophore and focused our main modification on replacement of pyridyl carboxamid group of sorafenib with quinoxalindione moiety in order to investigate the impact of increasing rigidity at the end of this backbone on the biological activities of the resulting compounds. Since antibacterial activities of quinoxalindione and diaryl urea derivatives have been reported separately, we were interested in investigating the antimicrobial activities of these new hybrid compounds with both pharmacophore moieties in a single scaffold ,,,,,.
In the present study 14 newly synthesized diaryl urea derivatives which were developed in our laboratory were evaluated for in vitro cytotoxicity and antimicrobial activities. The inhibitory activity of these compounds against two cancer cell lines including human breast cancer (MCF-7) and human liver cancer (HepG2) cell lines was evaluated using the standard 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5- diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Antibacterial and anti-fungal activities of these compounds were screened by Microplate Alamar Blue Assay (MABA).
In order to investigate the interaction between B-Raf kinase inhibitors and B-Raf kinase, molecular dynamic simulation (MD ) was performed on the best docking pose of the ligand with lowest binding energy. For this purpose, the protein structure was simulated in a grid box with water molecules and physiologic concentration of the salt. The binding pattern of the ligand after simulation was obtained. This fingerprint pattern can be helpful in the design of more potent molecules in future studies.
| Materials and Methods|| |
The following microorganisms were used as diluted samples with broth culture: Staphylococcus aureus PTCC 1337, Bacillus subtilis PTCC 1032, Listeria. Monocytogenes PTCC 1165, Escherichia More Details coli PTCC 1338, Pseudomonas aeruginosa PTCC 1074, Salmonella More Details. Enteritidis PTCC 1091 and Candida albicans PTCC 5027. All microorganisms were obtained from Persian Type Culture Collection (PTCC). Mueller- Hinton broth (Merk, Germany) and RPMI- 1640 (Gibco, Scotland) were used for growth of bacteria and fungi, respectively. MTT, and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) were purchased from Merck, Germany.
Absorbances were determined with an ELISA plate reader (ELX 808, USA). MCF-7 cells were purchased from Pasteur Institute, Tehran, Iran. The stock solutions (10000 μM) of synthesized compounds were prepared by dissolving in DMSO and diluted with distilled water to acheive 10, 100, 250, 500 μM concentrations. Since the primary stock was prepared in DMSO and then diluted to a ratio of at least 1/200, therefore, the highest concentration of DMSO in each cell would be less than 0.5% or even lesser.
Biological activity procedures
In vitro cytotoxicity assay
MCF-7 and HepG2 cell lines were maintained respectively in RPMI-1640 and DMEM/F12 medium supplemented with fetal bovine serum (FBS) (10%, v/v) and antibiotics [penicillin (100 units/mL) and streptomycin (100 mg/mL)] in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C ,. Briefly, after 2-3 subcultures, 180 μL of the cells (4.5 × 104 and 6 × 104 cells/mL of MCF-7 and HepG2, respectively) were seeded in triplicate on 96-well microplates and incubated for 24 h. Cells were treated with 20 μL of different concentrations of the derivatives (10, 100, 250, 500 μM) for 48 h. The final concentrations of the compounds were 1, 10, 25, 50 μM on the plate.
Sorafenib was used as the positive control and the wells containing cell suspension was regarded as the negative control. The blank wells consisted of 200 μL of the corresponding medium. The microplates were further incubated for 48 h. To evaluate cell survival, each well was then incubated with 20 μL of MTT solution (5 mg/mL in PBS) for 3 h and the media in each well were replaced with 150 μL DMSO. The absorbance of each well was measured at 570 nm using an ELISA reader. Each experiment was repeated three times. The percentage of cell viability was calculated using the following formula:
Viable cells (%) = [(T-B)/(C-B)] × 100
where, C is the absorbance of negative control, T is the absorbance of treated samples, and B is the absorbance of the blank. The IC50 values represent the mean of three independent experiments each performed in triplicate. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey test was used to determine the differences between IC50 values of each compound and sorafenib as positive control. All results were expressed as mean ± S.EM and P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Antibacterial and antifungal evaluation
The in vitro antibacterial and antifungal activities of the synthesized compounds were studied by MABA using 96-wells microplates ,.
At first, all tested microbial strains were sub-cultured overnight in a suitable medium (Mueller–Hinton agar for bacterial strains and Sabouraud dextrose agar for fungal pathogen) followed by their cultivation in the broth medium to obtain 0.5 McFarland standard turbidity (1.5 × l08 CFU/mL). Mueller-Hinton broth was used as medium for growth of bacteria.
Except negative control wells which should contain 160 μL of medium, 140 μL of culture medium poured into each well of 96-well plates.
Subsequently 20 μL of each bacterial suspension was distributed in all 96 wells of microplate including positive control (containing microorganism and standard antibiotic) and negative control (containing microorganism and culture medium). Then 20 μL of each concentration of the synthesized compounds were added to two neighbour wells except for positive and growth control wells. After adding alamarBlue (20 μL) to all of 96 wells the total volume in each well reaches to 200 μL. The final concentrations of the tested compounds were 512, 256, 128, 64 and 32 μg/mL. Plates were covered and sealed with para film and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. After incubation, results were recorded as minimum concentration of each synthesized compound which completely inhibited growth of microorganism (MIC).
Antifungal activity was determined as antibacterial assay except with some modifications. The final size of inoculum was 1.0 × 106 CFU/mL for fungi and the turbidity was measured spectrometrically at 580 nm. The antibacterial agent ciprofloxacin and antifungal agent fluconazole were used as the standard controls. All experiments were performed in triplicate and mean of the obtained results are reported.
Molecular docking and molecular dynamic simulation
Autodock 4.2 software package was performed for this study, briefly the crystal structure of B-RAF kinase combined with BAX was retrieved from Protein Data Bank (pdb code: 1UWH) . Grid and docking parameter files were generated by AutoDock Tools version 6.5.1 ,. For the preparation of protein, the original ligand and water molecules were removed from the coordinates and Kollman charges together with polar hydrogens were added. For ligands, Gasteiger charges were assigned and non-polar hydrogens were merged.
The grid map of 60 × 60 × 60 Å points in x, y and z directions was centered on the binding site Cys85 with a spacing of 0.375 Å. Lamarckian genetic algorithm  was used for docking with the following settings: a maximum number of 2500000 energy evaluations, an initial population of 300, a maximum number of 27,000 generations and 100 independent docking runs.
AutoDock Tools and visual molecular dynamics (VMD) program was used to visualize hydrophobic and hydrogen-bonding interactions between the ligand and receptor.
The best docking pose of compound 16e with the lowest binding energy in complex with the protein structure was subjected to Gromacs 5.1.2 package . GROMOS96 53a6 force field  was used to prepare the input and topology files for the protein and the input files of the ligands were provided by means of PRODRG server .
Using pbc condition a box was constructed around the complex and it was solvated with simple point charge (SPC) water and 0.15 M of NaCl. A minimization step with steepest algorithm with maximum 50,000 steps was performed on the system.
Equilibration of the system was done using NVT and NPT with 1 ns in each step. Subsequently, a 30 ns MD started using time steps of 2 fs in periodic boundary condition. Leap-frog integrator together with Berendsen thermostat were used during simulation. Particle Mesh Ewald for long-range electrostatics were used using cubic interpolation.
In case of bond parameters, Lincs algorithm was used for holonomic constraints. Isotropic type of Parrinello-Rahman was used for pressure coupling in NPT ensemble. The results containing trajectories were finally subjected to VMD to analyze the binding mode of the ligand during simulation . Then the root mean square deviations (RMSD) and residue root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) were analyzed to study the stability and flexibility of receptor during MD. The binding dynamics was investigated by means of Hbond and distance tools during MD.
| Result|| |
Cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities
All the synthesized compounds were tested for cytotoxic activity against HepG2 and MCF-7 cell lines by MTT assay. The IC50 value of each compound was compared with other compounds and also with the IC50 value obtained for sorafenib as the lead compound. The IC50 values of all compounds are given in [Table 1]. The results indicated that most compounds exhibited moderate to good activities against MCF-7 and HepG2 cell lines.
|Table 1: The structure and IC50 ± SEM values of synthesized compounds against MCF-7 and HepG2 cell lines.|
Click here to view
Compounds 15a and 16a without any substitution on the A ring indicated IC50 values in the range of 26- 32 μM against two cell lines closed to that of sorafenib (P > 0.05). In terms of antimicrobial and antifungal activities, only compounds 15b and 16f showed MIC of around 128 μg/mL and 15e and 15f showed MICs about 256 μg/mL against E. coli strain, while other compounds did not display significant antibacterial or antifungal effects.
Molecular docking and molecular dynamic simulation
After redocking the picture of superposition of the X-Ray crystal structures of BAX and docked structure is presented in [Figure 2] and also the binding energy calculated by AutoDock are summarized in [Table 2]. In order to get an insight into the diversity of poses which include location, orientation and conformation for each ligand, RMSD values of all poses were calculated based on the best pose as reference.
|Figure 2: Comparison between the docked and the X-Ray crystal structures of BAX (yellow: docked structure; red: crystal structure).|
Click here to view
|Table 2: Binding energy (ΔGb, kcal/mol) and inhibition constants (Ki, nM) of synthesized compounds against B-RAF|
Click here to view
The RMSD table of all poses compared to the best pose for each ligand is provided but part of the main table (20 runs out of 100 runs) is presented as a sample in [Table 3] due to the length of the main [Table 3].
|Table 3: The RMSD table of poses compared to the best pose for each ligand (run 81 to 100): RMSD values in the range 0 to 2 as blue and farther distances as red.|
Click here to view
After MD simulation, the RMSD values of backbone atoms referring to the starting structure were used to monitor the dynamic stability of the MD trajectories and RMSD plot is depicted in [Figure 3]a.
|Figure 3: Analysis plots of the protein backbone and ligand structure during simulation: (A) RMSD plot; (B) Plot of Hbond distribution vs time; (C) RMSF plot; (D) Plot of Hbond distribution vs distance|
Click here to view
The MD trajectories also were analyzed to calculate of number of hydrogen bonds (H-bonds) which were formed during MD simulation [Figure 3]b.
The root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) of backbone residues was carried out to recognize the variations of protein flexibility [Figure 3]c.
The binding mode of the compound 16e at the end of simulation is displayed in [Figure 4]. A heat map was also generated using VMD to show flexibility of the residues in the binding site during simulation as depicted in [Figure 5].
|Figure 4: The binding mode of 16e in the active site (A) before and (B) after simulation.|
Click here to view
|Figure 5: Heat map of the residues in the binding site during simulation.|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
The preliminary SARs showed that substitution of lipophilic groups such as CF3 or SMe at the meta position of the A ring without considering electron donating or electron withdrawing properties of substituent led to the increased activity in compounds 15b, 16b, 15e and 16e with IC50 values 10, 10, 12 and 14 μM against MCF-7 cell line and 12, 13, 15 and 17 μM against HepG2 cell line which were significantly different from IC50 values of parent compounds 15a and 16a at P < 0.001. Compounds 15d and 16d with a Cl substituent at the ortho position of the A ring revealed higher activity than the parent compounds (15a, 16a) on the two cell lines with IC50 values of 16 μM and 18 μM on MCF- 7 cells and 10 and 11 μM on HepG2 cell line (P < 0.001). Introduction of F group at the ortho position along with CF3 at the meta position diminished activities of compound 15c in comparison with the compound without F group (15b) (P < 0.001 ). Compounds 15g and 16g with OMe group at the ortho position along with CF3 group at the meta position showed remarkably decreased activities (IC50 > 50 μM) compared to compounds without OMe substituent ( 15b, 16b) in both cell lines. These results indicated that compounds with two substituents on the A ring showed less activity than compounds with one substituent (compound 15b which have only CF3 substituent on the A ring showed significantly different IC50 value compared to compounds 15c, 15f). On the other hand, ortho position of the A ring indicates the susceptibility to the size of the substituent, since the bulky substituent such as the OMe group, reduces significantly the activity of compounds of 15g and 16g compared to the small F substituent in compounds 15c and 16c.
Compounds 15d and 16d with a Cl substituent at the ortho position of the A ring revealed increased activities compared to the parent (15a, 16a) compound on the two cell lines. Although antimicrobial activity has been reported for some quinoxalinedione and diaryl urea derivatives, none of these novel compounds displayed significant antibacterial or antifungal activities ,,, which could be due to the inaccessibility of the pharmacophoric part to corresponding target sites in bacteria.
To ensure the validity of docking, the cognate ligand (BAX) was re-docked into the binding site of B-Raf kinase (PDB cod: 1UWH). The RMSD values for superposition of the cognate ligand and the best docking pose from the self-docking study was 1.6 Å [Figure 2]. This shows the validity of docking simulation for other ligands in this study. Docking results showed that these novel diaryl urea compounds were adopted properly by the B-RAF kinase binding site, suggesting that they could be potential inhibitors of B-RAF kinase.
In order to get an insight into the diversity of poses which include location, orientation and conformation for each ligand, RMSD values of all poses were calculated based on the best pose as the reference. As shown in [Table 3], comparison of the RMSD of all poses to the best pose, for each ligand, the cells with RMSD values in the range 0 to 2 were highlighted as blue and the cells with farther distances were highlighted as red.
Based on this clustering approach, most poses of the ligand 15a were in the cluster of the best pose while in case of ligand 16c the largest RMSD distances were observed. As it can be seen, the system reached a plateau after 20 ns from the beginning of the simulation . RMSD plot of the protein backbone and the ligand after 30 ns of simulation is depicted in [Figure 2]a. By studying the RMSD plot of the protein backbone and the ligand after 30 ns of MD simulation [Figure 3]a, it can be seen that the system reached a plateau after 20 ns from the beginning of the simulation  and the ligand was stable after this time and also fit in the active site and stabilized. Result of Hbond in MD showed that in most frames two hydrogen bonds were found between ligand and protein structure [Figure 3]b. It was also found that the most interactions were localized in 0.29 nm distance [Figure 3]d. As shown in [Figure 3]c, RMSF plot revealed that most fluctuations of the residues were observed in C-terminal and N-terminal residues. In addition, residues ILE200, LEU150, ASP147 and ALA151 revealed considerable fluctuations during simulation. The binding mode of the compound 16e at the end of simulation is displayed in [Figure 4]. Comparing the binding mode of the compound before and after simulation shows that conformational change of the main chain in ASP147 led to the formation of a hydrogen bond between amine group in this residue and urea moiety in the ligand [Figure 4]. This result is in accord with the high flexibility of this residue during MD simulation as depicted in [Figure 5].
| Conclusion|| |
In summary, a novel series of dual diaryl urea bearing quinoxalindione moiety derivatives were screened for their cytotoxicity against two cancer cell lines. In this series of compounds we observed that replacement of pyridyl carboxamide moiety of sorafenib with rigid quinoxalindione moiety resulted compounds 15b, 16b, 15e, 16e, 15d and 16d which showed high potency against one or two cell lines. In addition, no significant antibacterial or antifungal activities were detected. The binding modes of all compounds at the active site of B-RAF protein were recognized by molecular docking. All compounds were perfectly placed in the active site. MD simulation analyses on compound 16e such as RMSD, RMSF revealed that this compound is stable in B-RAF active site. This research highlights the cytotoxic potential for further development of these novel diaryl urea derivatives.
| Acknowledgments|| |
The content of this paper is extracted from the Ph.D thesis (No. 394159) submitted by Sedighe Sadeghian-Rizi which was financially supported by the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
| References|| |
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69-90.
Kim S-K. Handbook of anticancer drugs from marine origin. Springer International Publishing Switzerland. 2015: pp. 1-15.
Solomon VR, Hu C, Lee H. Hybrid pharmacophore design and synthesis of isatin-benzothiazole analogs for their anti-breast cancer activity. Bioorg Med Chem. 2009;17(21):7585-7592.
Noolvi MN, Patel HM, Bhardwaj V, Chauhan A. Synthesis and in vitro
antitumor activity of substituted quinazoline and quinoxaline derivatives: search for anticancer agent. Eur J Med Chem. 2011;46(6):2327-2346.
Kim HJ, Cho HJ, Kim H, El-Gamal MI, Oh CH, Lee SH, et al
. New diarylureas and diarylamides possessing acet(benz)amidophenyl scaffold: design, synthesis, and antiproliferative activity against melanoma cell line. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2012;22(9):3269-3273.
Zambon A, Ménard D, Suijkerbuijk BMJM, Niculescu-Duvaz I, Whittaker S, Niculescu-Duvaz D, et al
. Novel hinge binder improves activity and pharmacokinetic properties of BRAF inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2010;53(15):5639-5655.
Zhao CR, Wang RQ, Li G, Xue XX, Sun CJ, Qu XJ, et al
. Synthesis of indazole based diarylurea derivatives and their antiproliferative activity against tumor cell lines. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2013;23(7):1989-1992.
Sirohi B, Philip DS, Shrikhande SV. Regorafenib in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Future Oncol. 2014;10(9):1581-1587.
Kim ST, Kim TW, Kim Kp, Kim TY, Han SW, Lee JY, et al
. Regorafenib as salvage treatment in Korean patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47(4):790-795.
Wong HH, Eisen T. Tivozanib for the treatment of metastatic renal cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2013;13(6):649-660.
Pal SK, Bergerot PG, Figlin RA. Tivozanib: current status and future directions in the treatment of solid tumors. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2012;21(12):1851-1859.
Marlow M, Al-Ameedee M, Smith T, Wheeler S, Stocks MJ. Linifanib–a multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor and a low molecular weight gelator. Chem Commun. 2015;51(29):6384-6387.
Toh HC, Chen PJ, Carr BI, Knox JJ, Gill S, Ansell P, et al
. Phase 2 trial of linifanib (ABT-869) in patients with unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 2013;119(2):380-387.
Noorulla S, Sreenivasulu N, Khan A, Sayeed A. Antibacterial activity of novel substituted quinoxaline heterocycles. Pharmanest. 2011 ;2(2- 3):229-238.
Gupta G, Verma P. Antimicrobial activity of quinoxaline derivatives. Chem Inform. 2015;46(4):876- 884.
Batra S, Tusi Z, Madapa S. Medicinal chemistry of ureido derivatives as anti-infectives. antiinfect agents. Med Chem. 2006;5(2):135-160.
Doğruer DS, Urlu Ş, Önkol T, Özçelik B, Şahin MF. Synthesis of some pyridazine derivatives carrying urea, thiourea, and sulfonamide moieties and their antimicrobial activity. Turk J Chem. 2010;34(1):57- 65.
Madapa S, Tusi Z, Sridhar D, Kumar A, Siddiqi MI, Srivastava K, et al
. Search for new pharmacophores for antimalarial activity. Part I: synthesis and antimalarial activity of new 2-methyl-6-ureido-4- quinolinamides. Bioorg Med Chem. 2009;17(1):203- 221.
Sadeghian-Rizi S, Khodarahmi G, Amirhossein Sakhteman A, Jahanian-Najafabadi A, Rostami M, Mirzaei M, et al.
Synthesis and characterization of some novel diaryl urea derivatives bearing quinoxalindione moiety. Res Pharm Sci. Ahead print.
Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983;65(1- 2):55-63.
Freshney R. Ian . Culture of animal cells: a manual of basic technique. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Hoboken, New Jersey. Published simultaneously in Canada. 1994: pp. 205-216.
Schwalbe R, Steele-Moore L, Goodwin A.C. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing protocols. New York CRC. 2007: pp. 75-79.
To WK, Fothergill AW, Rinaldi MG. Comparative evaluation of macrodilution and alamar colorimetric microdilution broth methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33(10):2660-2664.
Wan PT, Garnett MJ, Roe SM, Lee S, Niculescu- Duvaz D, Good VM, et al
. Mechanism of activation of the RAF-ERK signaling pathway by oncogenic mutations of B-RAF. Cell. 2004;116(6):855-867.
Sanner MF. Python: a programming language for software integration and development. J Mol Graph Model. 1999;17(1):57-61.
Sadeghian-Rizi S, Sakhteman A, Hassanzadeh F. A quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) study of some diaryl urea derivatives of B-RAF inhibitors. Res Pharm Sci. 2016;11(6):445-453.
Levinson NM, Kuchment O, Shen K, Young MA, Koldobskiy M, et al
. A Src-like inactive conformation in the abl tyrosine kinase domain. PLoS Biol. 2006;4(5):e144.
Abraham MJ, Murtola T, Schulz R, Páll S, Smith JC, Hess B, et al
. GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX. 2015;1:19-25.
Oostenbrink C, Villa A, Mark AE, Van Gunsteren WF. A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6. J. Comput. Chem. 2004;25(13):1656-1676.
SchuÈttelkopf AW, Van Aalten DM. PRODRG: a tool for high-throughput crystallography of protein–ligand complexes. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2004;60(8):1355-1363.
Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph Model. 1996;14(1):33-38.
Corona P, Carta A, Loriga M, Vitale G, Paglietti G. Synthesis and in vitro
antitumor activity of new quinoxaline derivatives. Eur J Med Chem. 2009;44(4):1579-1591.
Grande F, Aiello F, Grazia OD, Brizzi A, Garofalo A, Neamati N. Synthesis and antitumor activities of a series of novel quinoxalinhydrazides. Bioorg Med Chem. 2007;15(1):288-294.
Tanimori S, Nishimura T, Kirihata M. Synthesis of novel quinoxaline derivatives and its cytotoxic activities. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2009;19(15):4119-4121.
Zarranz B, Jaso A, Aldana I, Monge A. Synthesis and anticancer activity evaluation of new 2-alkylcarbonyl and 2-benzoyl-3-trifluoromethyl-quinoxaline 1,4-di-N-oxide derivatives. Bioorg Med Chem. 2004;12(13):3711-3721.
Kumari R, Kumar R, Lynn A. g_mmpbsa—A GROMACS tool for high-throughput MM-PBSA calculations. J Chem Inf Model. 2014;54(7): 1951-1962.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]